Sunday, December 19, 2010

The Coming Evangelical Collapse

The Coming Evangelical Collapse

Mike Spencer
The Internet Monk
A Modern Day
Prophetic Voice
This article is a wake-up call to all of us who think of our church ministry as business as usual. Michael Spencer lived his life seeking to communicate relevant information designed to shake us from our lethargy to following Christ with whole-hearted devotion. After a long battle with cancer he recently went home to be with his Lord. His work is carried on by his friends and colleagues and Mikes writing and thinking can be seen best on his blog. InternetMonk.com. His blog has consistently been in the top 20 Christian blogs and is well worth a regular visit.





An anti-Christian chapter in Western history is about to begin. But out of the ruins, a new vitality and integrity will rise.
By Michael Spencer from the March 10, 2009 edition




Oneida, Ky. - We are on the verge – within 10 years – of a major collapse of evangelical Christianity. This breakdown will follow the deterioration of the mainline Protestant world and it will fundamentally alter the religious and cultural environment in the West.



Within two generations, evangelicalism will be a house deserted of half its occupants. (Between 25 and 35 percent of Americans today are Evangelicals.) In the “Protestant” 20th century, Evangelicals flourished. But they will soon be living in a very secular and religiously antagonistic 21st century.


This collapse will herald the arrival of an anti-Christian chapter of the post-Christian West. Intolerance of Christianity will rise to levels many of us have not believed possible in our lifetimes, and public policy will become hostile toward evangelical Christianity, seeing it as the opponent of the common good.

Millions of Evangelicals will quit. Thousands of ministries will end. Christian media will be reduced, if not eliminated. Many Christian schools will go into rapid decline. I’m convinced the grace and mission of God will reach to the ends of the earth. But the end of evangelicalism as we know it is close.

Why is this going to happen?

1. Evangelicals have identified their movement with the culture war and with political conservatism. This will prove to be a very costly mistake. Evangelicals will increasingly be seen as a threat to cultural progress. Public leaders will consider us bad for America, bad for education, bad for children, and bad for society.


The evangelical investment in moral, social, and political issues has depleted our resources and exposed our weaknesses. Being against gay marriage and being rhetorically pro-life will not make up for the fact that massive majorities of Evangelicals can’t articulate the Gospel with any coherence. We fell for the trap of believing in a cause more than a faith.

2. We Evangelicals have failed to pass on to our young people an orthodox form of faith that can take root and survive the secular onslaught. Ironically, the billions of dollars we’ve spent on youth ministers, Christian music, publishing, and media has produced a culture of young Christians who know next to nothing about their own faith except how they feel about it. Our young people have deep beliefs about the culture war, but do not know why they should obey scripture, the essentials of theology, or the experience of spiritual discipline and community. Coming generations of Christians are going to be monumentally ignorant and unprepared for culture-wide pressures.

3. There are three kinds of evangelical churches today: consumer-driven megachurches, dying churches, and new churches whose future is fragile. Denominations will shrink, even vanish, while fewer and fewer evangelical churches will survive and thrive.

4. Despite some very successful developments in the past 25 years, Christian education has not produced a product that can withstand the rising tide of secularism. Evangelicalism has used its educational system primarily to staff its own needs and talk to itself.

5. The confrontation between cultural secularism and the faith at the core of evangelical efforts to “do good” is rapidly approaching. We will soon see that the good Evangelicals want to do will be viewed as bad by so many, and much of that work will not be done. Look for ministries to take on a less and less distinctively Christian face in order to survive.

6. Even in areas where Evangelicals imagine themselves strong (like the Bible Belt), we will find a great inability to pass on to our children a vital evangelical confidence in the Bible and the importance of the faith.

7. The money will dry up.

What will be left?
  • Expect evangelicalism to look more like the pragmatic, therapeutic, church-growth oriented megachurches that have defined success. Emphasis will shift from doctrine to relevance, motivation, and personal success – resulting in churches further compromised and weakened in their ability to pass on the faith.
  • Two of the beneficiaries will be the Roman Catholic and Orthodox communions. Evangelicals have been entering these churches in recent decades and that trend will continue, with more efforts aimed at the “conversion” of Evangelicals to the Catholic and Orthodox traditions.
  • A small band will work hard to rescue the movement from its demise through theological renewal. This is an attractive, innovative, and tireless community with outstanding media, publishing, and leadership development. Nonetheless, I believe the coming evangelical collapse will not result in a second reformation, though it may result in benefits for many churches and the beginnings of new churches.
  • The emerging church will largely vanish from the evangelical landscape, becoming part of the small segment of progressive mainline Protestants that remain true to the liberal vision.
  • Aggressively evangelistic fundamentalist churches will begin to disappear.
  • Charismatic-Pentecostal Christianity will become the majority report in evangelicalism. Can this community withstand heresy, relativism, and confusion? To do so, it must make a priority of biblical authority, responsible leadership, and a reemergence of orthodoxy.
  •  Evangelicalism needs a “rescue mission” from the world Christian community. It is time for missionaries to come to America from Asia and Africa. Will they come? Will they be able to bring to our culture a more vital form of Christianity?


Expect a fragmented response to the culture war. Some Evangelicals will work to create their own countercultures, rather than try to change the culture at large. Some will continue to see conservatism and Christianity through one lens and will engage the culture war much as before – a status quo the media will be all too happy to perpetuate. A significant number, however, may give up political engagement for a discipleship of deeper impact.
Is all of this a bad thing?

Evangelicalism doesn’t need a bailout. Much of it needs a funeral. But what about what remains?

Is it a good thing that denominations are going to become largely irrelevant? Only if the networks that replace them are able to marshal resources, training, and vision to the mission field and into the planting and equipping of churches.

Is it a good thing that many marginal believers will depart? Possibly, if churches begin and continue the work of renewing serious church membership. We must change the conversation from the maintenance of traditional churches to developing new and culturally appropriate ones.

The ascendency of Charismatic-Pentecostal-influenced worship around the world can be a major positive for the evangelical movement if reformation can reach those churches and if it is joined with the calling, training, and mentoring of leaders. If American churches come under more of the influence of the movement of the Holy Spirit in Africa and Asia, this will be a good thing.

Will the evangelicalizing of Catholic and Orthodox communions be a good development? One can hope for greater unity and appreciation, but the history of these developments seems to be much more about a renewed vigor to “evangelize” Protestantism in the name of unity.
Will the coming collapse get Evangelicals past the pragmatism and shallowness that has brought about the loss of substance and power? Probably not. The purveyors of the evangelical circus will be in fine form, selling their wares as the promised solution to every church’s problems. I expect the landscape of megachurch vacuity to be around for a very long time.

Will it shake lose the prosperity Gospel from its parasitical place on the evangelical body of Christ? Evidence from similar periods is not encouraging. American Christians seldom seem to be able to separate their theology from an overall idea of personal affluence and success.
The loss of their political clout may impel many Evangelicals to reconsider the wisdom of trying to create a “godly society.” That doesn’t mean they’ll focus solely on saving souls, but the increasing concern will be how to keep secularism out of church, not stop it altogether. 

The integrity of the church as a countercultural movement with a message of “empire subversion” will increasingly replace a message of cultural and political entitlement.



Despite all of these challenges, it is impossible not to be hopeful. As one commenter has already said, “Christianity loves a crumbling empire.”

We can rejoice that in the ruins, new forms of Christian vitality and ministry will be born. I expect to see a vital and growing house church movement. This cannot help but be good for an evangelicalism that has made buildings, numbers, and paid staff its drugs for half a century.

We need new evangelicalism that learns from the past and listens more carefully to what God says about being His people in the midst of a powerful, idolatrous culture.
I’m not a prophet. My view of evangelicalism is not authoritative or infallible. I am certainly wrong in some of these predictions. But is there anyone who is observing evangelicalism in these times who does not sense that the future of our movement holds many dangers and much potential?



Michael Spencer was a writer and communicator living and working in a Christian community in Kentucky. He describes himself as “a post-evangelical reformation Christian in search of a Jesus-shaped spirituality.” This essay is adapted from a series on his blog, InternetMonk.com .

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Healing Scriptures



HEALING SCRIPTURES

“He sent His Word,
and healed them”
Psalm 107:20


With so many of my friends going through sickness, operations and facing so many health issues I believe it is important that we never lose sight of who the great Physician is. I have been meditating on the wonders of how he cares for each of us no matter what we are going through. There are so many passages in scripture that remind us to keep our hope in Him

HEALING IS IN CHRIST’S ATONEMENT….

He bore it all “Surely He hath borne our griefs (literal Hebrew is “sicknesses”) and carried our sorrows (pains); yet we did esteem Him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon Him; and with His stripes we are healed” (Isaiah 53:4-5).

He healed all the sick “…and He…healed ALL that were sick: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying, ‘Himself took our infirmities and bare our sicknesses’” (Matthew 8:16-17).

By His stripes… “Who His own self bare our sins in His own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by Whose stripes ye were healed” (I Peter 2:24).

In Deuteronomy 28:15-22, 27-29, 35-61 we read that all sickness and disease is a curse of the law. But in Galatians 3:13 we then read that Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law:

Redeemed from the curse “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, ‘Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree’ (Galatians 3:13).



HEALING IS THE WILL OF THE FATHER….

God is our healer “…for I am the LORD that healeth thee” (Exodus 15:26).

Healing as God’s blessings “And ye shall serve the LORD your God, and He shall bless thy bread, and thy water; and I will take sickness away from the midst of thee. There shall nothing cast their young, nor be barren, in they land: the number of thy days I will fulfill” (Exodus 23:25-26).

Healing and protection “There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling…with long life will I satisfy him, and show him My salvation” (Psalm 91:10, 16).

He heals all diseases “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and forget not ALL His benefits: Who forgiveth ALL thine iniquities; Who healeth ALL thine diseases” (Psalm 103:2-3).

The power of His Word  “So shall My word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto Me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it” (Isaiah 55:11).

JESUS’ WORKS INCLUDED HEALING…


Jesus anointed to heal “How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and power: who went about doing good, and healing all who were oppressed of the devil…” (Acts 10:38)   Christ is the Healer, the enemy is the oppressor; we need to appropriate Jesus’ finished work on the Cross.

Leper “And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped Him, saying, ‘Lord, if Thou wilt, Thou canst make me clean. And Jesus put forth His hand, and touched him, saying, ‘I will; be thou clean” (Matthew 8:2-3).
Fever “And when Jesus was come into Peter's house, he saw his wife's mother laid, and sick of a fever. And he touched her hand, and the fever left her: and she arose, and ministered unto them” (Matt 8:14-15).

Paralytic “Some men brought to him a paralytic, lying on a mat. When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, ‘Take heart, son; your sins are forgiven.’ At this, some of the teachers of the law said to themselves, This fellow is blaspheming! Knowing their thoughts, Jesus said, ‘Why do you entertain evil thoughts in your hearts? Which is easier: to say, Your sins are forgiven, or to say, Get up and walk? But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins...’ Then he said to the paralytic, ‘Get up, take your mat and go home.’ And the man got up and went home”   (Matt 9:2-7).

Bleeding woman “And a woman was there who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years. She had suffered a great deal under the care of many doctors and had spent all she had, yet instead of getting better she grew worse. When she heard about Jesus, she came up behind him in the crowd and touched his cloak, because she thought, ‘If I just touch his clothes, I will be healed.’ Immediately her bleeding stopped and she felt in her body that she was freed from her suffering” (Mark 5:25-29).

Blind man “So Jesus answered and said to him, ‘What do you want Me to do for you?’ The blind man said to Him, ‘Rabboni, that I may receive my sight.’  Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go your way; your faith has made you well.’ And immediately he received his sight and followed Jesus on the road” (Mark 10:51-52).

Cripple woman “And a woman was there who had been crippled by a spirit for eighteen years. She was bent over and could not straighten up at all. When Jesus saw her, he called her forward and said to her, ‘Woman, you are set free from your infirmity.’ Then he put his hands on her, and immediately she straightened up and praised God” (Luke 13:11-13).

Lepers “As he was going into a village, ten men who had leprosy met him. They stood at a distance and called out in a loud voice, ‘Jesus, Master, have pity on us!’ When he saw them, he said, "Go, show yourselves to the priests." And as they went, they were cleansed. (Luke 17:12-14).

Withered hand “And, behold, there was a man which had his hand withered. And they asked him, saying, ‘Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath day?’ that they might accuse him. And he said unto them, ‘What man shall there be among you, that shall have one sheep, and if it fall into a pit on the Sabbath day, will he not lay hold on it, and lift it out? How much then is a man better than a sheep? Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the Sabbath day.?’ Then saith he to the man, ‘Stretch forth thine hand.’ And he stretched it forth; and it was restored” (Matt 12:10-13).

Jesus: God’s will in action Jesus said of Himself, “I came not to do My own will, but the will of Him that sent me” (John 6:38). Everything Jesus did was the will of the Father, for He was the will of God in action. If you want to know if healing is God’s will, look at Jesus. “The thief cometh not, but for to steal, to kill and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly” (John 10:10).

Jesus healing every sickness and disease “And Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching…and preaching…and healing every sickness and every disease among the people” (Matthew 9:35).

Great multitudes healed “And great multitudes came unto Him, having with them those that were lame, blind, dumb, maimed, and many others, and cast them down at Jesus’ feet: and He healed them: insomuch that the crowd wondered, when they saw the dumb to speak, the maimed to be whole, the lame to walk, and the blind to see: and they glorified the God of Israel” (Matthew 15:30-31).

Jesus’ constancy “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and today, and forever” (Hebrews 13:8).

HEALING AS THE MINISTRY OF THE CHURCH…


The importance of faith “For verily I say unto you, that whosoever shall say unto this mountain,  ‘Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea,” and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith…therefore I say unto you, what things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them” (Mark 11:23-24).

Greater works “Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that believeth on Me, the works that I do shall he do also: and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto My Father” (John 14:12)

These signs shall follow… “And He said unto them, ‘Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature…and these signs shall follow them that believe; in My Name shall they cast out devils…they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover’” (Mark 16:15, 17-18).

One way the church is to respond to the sick “Is any sick among you? Let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: and the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him” (James 5:14-15).

God’s desire “Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth” (3 John 2).

The believer is an overcomer “Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is He that is in you, than he that is in the world” (1 John 4:4).

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Church Planting Revisiting The Subject

Planting New Churches
Revisiting The Subject

For the past number of years I have had the privilege of teaching in India at Nava Jeva Ashram. Good  friends of ours Ken and Vinni Henson teach there. . I was asked to write an article for them to encourage Church Planting. The article that follows here is what I sent to them for publication. May it encourage you to think afresh about the important task of multiplying new congregations and also about what is the most effective means of so doing.

The number of Christians still attending traditional, legacy-type churches as their only expression of faith is rapidly declining. Currently only 34%-36% of persons in America attend a church of any kind weekly and an even smaller percentage of the total is part of these legacy type churches. The apparent but sad truth is that even people who claim to be Christians have rejected the traditional churches and are either not worshipping with any congregation or are attending a new kind of church.  
The followers of Jesus Christ in the United States who do not attend a local traditional church will grow from 30% to 70% in the next twenty years.
Ken and Vinni Henson
This coupled with the fact that the last 50 years have seen the church to population ratio go from approximately one church for every 600 people in America to approximately one church for every 2000 persons today. Our current influence as the church upon culture is waning and if we are to be faithful to the Lord's command and commission to us we must look pragmatically at what He has and is blessing. The current model is broken.
The most common form of the church around the world, which in spite of national and international trends  is a home based or cell based church. These churches around the world are springing up and thriving. The 25 largest churches (See earlier blog article on Growth Mix) in the world have all grown and are built using this strategy.
It was the most common form of the church in New Testament times and it still flourishing today.
The percentage and number of Christians on a worldwide basis who meet in these home-based or cell-based churches has consistently been higher than in the United States and in most other areas of the world are actually the predominant model of church life.
Alternative, organic fellowship forms (house churches/simple churches/cell churches) currently home to 5% of American Christians will grow to make up 30% - 35%; another 30% - 35% will live out their faith in the fields of media, arts and culture; the remaining Christians attending non-traditional forms of church will have a family-based spiritual life. The participants in this revolution are not anti-Church! In fact, it is their desire to return to New Testament Christianity. In the opinion of most of these folks, it makes you one of the more pro-Church people around.
Student Body Nava Jeva Ashram 
These gatherings of smaller, organic groups outside the Sunday "talk-in-the-box" modality is not just another "bolt-on" program for the traditional church, but exists as one of the most effective ways of actually "doing" church differently in this 21st Century.
These observations about the emerging church model are the introduction to this article for a reason. I seems clear that what God has been and is doing is reaching this world through community based home churches where Christians in their locales live out the Christian faith in practical ways and their faith in Christ is visible for all to see.
It is also an observation of this missiologist that the largest most effective churches in the world are so because they are cell-based with hundreds and thousands of home based churches all around their cities and villages. It is clear that if persecution was to shut down the public worship of the church as happened in China in the 1950’s these churches rather than die would continue to thrive.
It is sad but true that if the public worship was destroyed in the modern institutional church there would not be much left and the church rather than progressing would have, whatever its witness was, silenced.
A new church in Kissi. Kenya The cells are gathered.
This 2 year old church has seen 140 plus new converts
in the last 6 months
When we then think about Church Planting and the modern missionary movement and we think about theological education and its role in the training of the next generation of leaders in the Christian movement the question is clear.
 “Does modern theological education by its curricula, and models of practical Christian service undermine the most effective strategy for reaching new persons with the gospel of Jesus Christ?
The obvious answer would seem to be “Of course not!” Not one theological institution of a basic evangelical persuasion would ever want to see what they taught be a detriment to persons coming to faith in Christ and serving Him as responsible members of His church
Teaching  At Nava Jeva Ashram
Bangalore India
However as I examine my own theological education through Bachelors, Masters and Doctoral work there was no hint of a class or course devoted to this critical issue. If the starting of a new church was mentioned at all it was most certainly assumed that it would be a church with a building, enough worship attendance to support the programs and a pastor. It’s not that the professors were against church planting however, but for the vast majority of them their total life experience was in the paradigm of an existing institutional church. The problem was an over all ethos in the educational environment that seemed to have certain assumptions upon which the education process was built. Let me give you a few.
1.    To help the student learn and understand the Bible and Theology is our primary task. We are not the determiners of what is done with this learning after the students leave. We are called to be faithful teachers.
2.    Most students if they enter full time ministry will go and serve existing churches (that look like the traditional institutional church) so if practical ministry skills are to be taught, they are the skills necessary to build effective existing local churches.
3.    If students are to be church planters they either have an extremely rare set of entrepreneurial skills or the training on how to plant churches will be found in other agencies within and without denominations. It’s not the task of theological institutions to encourage and train for church planting.
4.    There is bias that new churches even if they are started need to look and act like existing churches and if they don’t the church plant has failed. (A personal experience in a “Church Planting” Course)
A Cell Church Baptism
5.    The assumption that because we as professors have advanced degrees earned from institutions filled with others who have advanced degrees we are effective because of what we know, rather than what we can do. Can you imagine what would change in our teaching if rather than graduation rates and GPA,  success was to be measured by how many churches were planted by those we taught? After all is that not the true meaning and intent of matheteuomaking a disciple.
Let me illustrate: Pastor A (An actual pastor) felt God’s direction calling him to plant a church in a new area of the community which had few churches and a large unreached population. The community was made up of persons who homogeneously were like the pastor. It had people in it who were highly educated, had well above average incomes and above average debt. The housing costs were in the top 1/3 of all the houses in the larger area. After going through a battery of tests to examine his and his families fitness for church planting and attending denomination sponsored and paid for church planting courses it was determined that he was a superior candidate and was approved to plant a church. At that point funding was secured to start the new church. A three-year commitment to supplement the pastor’s salary was made and the church was launched. He began to gather a nucleus which meeting in a number of homes grew to about 60 persons. The decision was made it was now time to launch “the church” and so a rental site in a local school was secured, flyers were printed and mailed and for that first Sunday a little over 100 persons “showed up”. It became clear early on that the services were primarily a gathering of these cell groups and those who had just drifted into worship through the advertising for the most part didn’t hang around very long. A stream of people came, stayed for a few weeks and drifted away unassimilated into this lager group. 
The congregation in Kissi Kenya gathered 
to learn how to be more effective in 
reaching the lost. In spite of their growth over 
the past year their passion for 
reaching the lost has not diminished. 
As the church entered the second year the struggle continued. Since the funding was on a 3 year declining scale the pastor had to take a part time job in the community and was actually putting less time and energy into the church than he had at the beginning (Remember survival is an extremely high and critical value). By the third year the pastor was working full time and struggling just to plan, fund, and execute the weekly worship services. So much of his energy was put into this weekly meeting that virtually all the effort that was at one time given to the home cells was all but abandoned. In year four public worship ceased and the church was now back to approximately 45 persons who were meeting weekly in homes. They were planning mission trips together, supporting missionaries, using their resources to help real people with needs in their community and they have now started to invite these persons to come to their homes. Baptisms occur but now instead of a church service they go to the beach and do it out in the open for the whole world to see. The people in the church love and care for one another and are growing in there faith not only in what they know but what they do. They still gather occasionally as a larger group when all the cells come together to do something together that would have been impossible to do as a simple home cell.
John and Mary Thannickal
Founders Of 

Nava Jeva Ashram
What has been the reaction to all this? First of all, from an institutional perspective, this is not considered one of our “successful church plants” by the denominational church planting committee. After all you hear people say there’s not a church, and by that they mean a building with a Sunday worship service. We invested all this money and they should have had 200 or so people now and should either have or be in the process of getting their first building.  (PS Most persons are blind to the fact that even a modest house in that area is over $1,000,000 and for all but wealthy or large congregations a building is out of reach). Even the pastor has bought into this model. While he is faithful in these multiple home groups he looks forward to the day he can have a full time pastorate with a building and a salary.
Pastor A has the best theological education possible with an M Div from a prestigious evangelical seminary.  He serves in a denominational body that has prioritized church planting. Why would Pastor A feel this experience as one of failure rather than success?
If we go back to the earlier observations about theological education and church planting and the measurement stick provided by them it is clear the church plant of Pastor A didn’t measure up and he was a “failure”. There will be a dissection of the experience asking what training he lacked, what mistakes were made, and that community will probably be branded as resistant to the gospel. Already a large regional church is being blamed as they could provide the program the church plant couldn't staff or afford.
It’s a surprise to me that as many of these churches actually survive and at some point thrive considering the uphill battle they must face. We can all point to the stars and assume every church start should measure up to “that”, whatever “that” is.
I believe the assumptions that were made set the church up for failure.  The image created the frame of reference for the judgment.
A successful church (if we look at it biblically) is not considered a church, an effective pastor is not considered an effective pastor and a receptive community is considered resistant to the gospel. All because we had a legacy based institutional model with its assumptions and baggage.
With Dr. Cho in his office. He not only saw 
God use him to buildthe largest church in the world
 but see it develop over100 ,000 cells. 
Each year thousands of Pastors, church planters
and lay leaders converge on the Yoido Church 
for the annualCell Church Conference
We have so valued the church as an organization and institution that we have missed the tremendous potential as we live out the church as part of a living organism. The church as the body of Christ is alive and vital. The church as an institution can become tradition-bound and ineffective.
What if the model was changed.  Perhaps we need to measure success by the changed lives of individuals both those of us who are Christians and the conversions of those who at one time were not. Maybe its time to put to rest the existing gold standard that ‘bigger is better”.
For example the institutional church in China had at its most optimistic estimates under a million persons who claimed to be Christians before the persecution drove the church underground. When the church moved from this institutional large gathering to being forced to live out it's Christianity in home cells/churches the church in China grew to be somewhere between 50 and 75 million believers. Some would even argue that God had the institutional church closed to reach China with the gospel.
The concept of the church in the New Testament has 3 pictures or models of how it is expressed.
  1. The universal church that has in it all believers of all time who are in this church by virtue of their relationship with Jesus Christ
  2. A church gathered in a local town or region where believers, usually a larger number than could meet in a home, came normally on a set time to a set place for worship teaching etc.
  3. A group of Christians who met in a home and were the witness to Christ in that community and the group practiced the essentials of what a local church is to be and do.
While we could give scores of scriptures to validate that these three forms of the Church are taught in the Scriptures, I would submit to you that the church which met in the home was the most common expression of the church in all the New Testament. When the scriptures teach that the number of churches multiplied daily there is no evidence archeologically or biblically that this was a church like our modern churches with multi- million dollar campuses, huge staffs and all the rest. All the evidence points to the fact that these were churches that met in homes. In fact you have to move a few hundred years into church history to see churches having buildings at all.
This should be so obvious to us that we would be praising Pastor A or any layperson who saw this scriptural truth clearly enough to actually reach the people that were their neighbors and friends, and dare to be in a relationship and accountability with other persons where the 30 or so “one another” commands of scripture could actually be practiced and that the celebration of baptism and the Lord’s supper would really be all that God wanted them to be.
Putting down the church that meets in a regional or local public setting would not be the purpose of this article. This article is to elevate the expectation that every Christian should be part of an effective church that meets in a home (whether they are also part of a Regional Church is not critical here). This article is also advocating that theological education ought to be giving the training in and modeling of this most effective means of church planting and effective evangelism. Would it not be an interesting requirement that every faculty member be a church planter in the true sense of the word? (Is this not what is taught when it says an elder is to have a good reputation of those without. Is it also a place where the leadership of the home church pastor is seen in relationship with spouse and children). Students could be in one of these churches as apprentice leaders and by the end of their first year I believe the majority could have planted a new church. The macro and micro skills of effective church leadership would have been taught not only cognitively but also by the modeling and example of the existing leader.
I close with this story from South America. I had the privilege of working with some missionaries in the villages and towns of the Amazon Basin. Power in a larger town was sporadic and resources were scarce and the poverty of the area was evident at every turn. The church did meet weekly but it was primarily the meeting of all the house church leaders and their assistants who came for training and accountability. If you were part of a cell you met together with the other cell leaders at the annual conference and perhaps once a quarter for a evangelistic crusade where you would be expected to bring your unsaved neighbors. Each cell also, approximately once every 5or 6 weeks, comes to the worship center where perhaps 10% of the cells are assigned for that Sunday. If you wanted to see the real church you waited until after dark and you would see on street after street a little fire being built in the middle of the road and as the fire started people came and gathered around. You could hear songs of praise, petitions of prayer and the study of God’s word. Attending where people from every generation. From the youngest babies to the oldest adults they were there. There were people who had been Christians many years, new Christians and persons that lived in the neighborhood who as yet didn’t know the Lord. As we walked through intersection after intersection and looked either way we saw literally hundreds of these effective churches sometimes 5 or 6 in one block publicly worshipping the Lord for all to see. That kind of witness is rarely seen in our existing institutional churches but here it was literally transforming a community.
Congregation of Village Church Plant 


As a missiologist I see this as what God is doing around the world. The majority of the new churches that are planted and new people being reached is being done through these effective house churches planted by Christians passionate about seeing the Great commission fulfilled in their location.
My appeal is to theological educators that they would understand the Biblical Theological, and Mission mandates and we would bring the practices in our personal lives and in our educational institutions into conformity to all of what God calls His church to be.
Can you dream with me of the potential if we really took all this seriously? Professors would have a wealth of illustrations as practitioners of the faith in a very real sense, students would become motivated to make a impact for God wherever He planted them, thousands of new churches would be started, and the desire of the Lord that this gospel be preached “panta ta ethne” would become a reality. Let it be Lord, let it be!